<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Warning: Objects May Be Older Than They Appear</title>
	<atom:link href="http://qmusings.com/2007/10/01/warning-objects-may-be-older-than-they-appear/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://qmusings.com/2007/10/01/warning-objects-may-be-older-than-they-appear/</link>
	<description>Something to Think About</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 21:52:28 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ack</title>
		<link>http://qmusings.com/2007/10/01/warning-objects-may-be-older-than-they-appear/comment-page-1/#comment-21224</link>
		<dc:creator>ack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 05:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://qmusings.com/blog/2007/10/01/warning-objects-may-be-older-than-they-appear/#comment-21224</guid>
		<description>part of the reason i went for it with eHarmony was that it was a free communication weekend.  so, no $$$ to shell out.  unfortuantely, i didn&#039;t meet anyone either, but i suppose it&#039;s better that all it cost me was some time.  (rather than time *and* $$$&#039;s.)

coulda been anything, but the religion comment might have meant i was hosed from the get-go.  (your basic agnostic here.)

MsQ:  where&#039;s the hot pic for us?  ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>part of the reason i went for it with eHarmony was that it was a free communication weekend.  so, no $$$ to shell out.  unfortuantely, i didn&#8217;t meet anyone either, but i suppose it&#8217;s better that all it cost me was some time.  (rather than time *and* $$$&#8217;s.)</p>
<p>coulda been anything, but the religion comment might have meant i was hosed from the get-go.  (your basic agnostic here.)</p>
<p>MsQ:  where&#8217;s the hot pic for us?  <img src='http://qmusings.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MsQ</title>
		<link>http://qmusings.com/2007/10/01/warning-objects-may-be-older-than-they-appear/comment-page-1/#comment-20965</link>
		<dc:creator>MsQ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 14:16:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://qmusings.com/blog/2007/10/01/warning-objects-may-be-older-than-they-appear/#comment-20965</guid>
		<description>Jill: I noticed that many people will state &quot;photos taken when I was in Hawaii June 2003...&quot; stuff like that. Probably those who&#039;ve had the &quot;So how recent is your photo&quot; question!

You could get your kids to take photos of you. The type of photos you use certain will act as a &quot;filter&quot; for men! I&#039;ve had conservative shots and the age of men who contact me shoots up (like 25+ years older) and when I put a mean/scary photo up just for chuckles, the age of the men who contacted me went down. It was an inneresting experiment. Now I just have a variety - casual, dressed up and one that I thought was cute and maybe a little sexy but one male friend said, &quot;Whoooooaaaaa HOT&quot; 

Well, you just never know. 

Beer-drinking Sunday school teachers and eHarmony? Who knows? You may be EXACTLY what they&#039;re looking for!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jill: I noticed that many people will state &#8220;photos taken when I was in Hawaii June 2003&#8230;&#8221; stuff like that. Probably those who&#8217;ve had the &#8220;So how recent is your photo&#8221; question!</p>
<p>You could get your kids to take photos of you. The type of photos you use certain will act as a &#8220;filter&#8221; for men! I&#8217;ve had conservative shots and the age of men who contact me shoots up (like 25+ years older) and when I put a mean/scary photo up just for chuckles, the age of the men who contacted me went down. It was an inneresting experiment. Now I just have a variety &#8211; casual, dressed up and one that I thought was cute and maybe a little sexy but one male friend said, &#8220;Whoooooaaaaa HOT&#8221; </p>
<p>Well, you just never know. </p>
<p>Beer-drinking Sunday school teachers and eHarmony? Who knows? You may be EXACTLY what they&#8217;re looking for!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jill</title>
		<link>http://qmusings.com/2007/10/01/warning-objects-may-be-older-than-they-appear/comment-page-1/#comment-20878</link>
		<dc:creator>Jill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 21:52:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://qmusings.com/blog/2007/10/01/warning-objects-may-be-older-than-they-appear/#comment-20878</guid>
		<description>When I&#039;ve run out of regular stuff to worry about with the whole online dating thing, I sometimes wonder how long it will take *my* pictures to expire!  I like the ones I&#039;ve got, but I am almost ALWAYS the one behind the camera, never in front of it.  

I have one that a dad of one of my Sunday school kids took for me last year.  He&#039;s a professional photographer but that picture will be a year old in December.  The other 3 are five months old or less and totally candid, but I doubt I could get pictures like those again either.  Guess I won&#039;t worry about it quite yet though - at least they&#039;re not THIRTY years old!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  Egads!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

That&#039;s weird about eHarmony!  I imagine my profile would be totally unacceptable...except, I do have a religion.  Still, probably no category for beer drinking Sunday school teachers (which reminds me, I never did that Geek Train one!!!!!!!!) :-0  :-0  :-0</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I&#8217;ve run out of regular stuff to worry about with the whole online dating thing, I sometimes wonder how long it will take *my* pictures to expire!  I like the ones I&#8217;ve got, but I am almost ALWAYS the one behind the camera, never in front of it.  </p>
<p>I have one that a dad of one of my Sunday school kids took for me last year.  He&#8217;s a professional photographer but that picture will be a year old in December.  The other 3 are five months old or less and totally candid, but I doubt I could get pictures like those again either.  Guess I won&#8217;t worry about it quite yet though &#8211; at least they&#8217;re not THIRTY years old!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  Egads!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</p>
<p>That&#8217;s weird about eHarmony!  I imagine my profile would be totally unacceptable&#8230;except, I do have a religion.  Still, probably no category for beer drinking Sunday school teachers (which reminds me, I never did that Geek Train one!!!!!!!!) :-0  :-0  :-0</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MsQ</title>
		<link>http://qmusings.com/2007/10/01/warning-objects-may-be-older-than-they-appear/comment-page-1/#comment-20807</link>
		<dc:creator>MsQ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 03:45:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://qmusings.com/blog/2007/10/01/warning-objects-may-be-older-than-they-appear/#comment-20807</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;ack:&lt;/strong&gt; I&#039;ve heard that eHarmony rejects many people! Stuff I&#039;ve read said that if you didn&#039;t have some type of religion marked you&#039;d get rejected. Dunno. I *think* it was eHarmony (it had to be a big site) where this friend&#039;s younger sister got rejected because .... she didn&#039;t have enough dating experience - or something. I guess they don&#039;t want uh, virgins? Not sure. 

Anyway, the big thing is that I&#039;ve heard that eHarmony rejects people. I *have* heard anecdotal evidence of people meeting and marrying via Match.com! I mean friend-of-a-friend stories.

Your story is just one more for my &quot;no eHarmony&quot; bucket. I think they are $$$$$ and have some long questionnaire. Zzzzzz.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>ack:</strong> I&#8217;ve heard that eHarmony rejects many people! Stuff I&#8217;ve read said that if you didn&#8217;t have some type of religion marked you&#8217;d get rejected. Dunno. I *think* it was eHarmony (it had to be a big site) where this friend&#8217;s younger sister got rejected because &#8230;. she didn&#8217;t have enough dating experience &#8211; or something. I guess they don&#8217;t want uh, virgins? Not sure. </p>
<p>Anyway, the big thing is that I&#8217;ve heard that eHarmony rejects people. I *have* heard anecdotal evidence of people meeting and marrying via Match.com! I mean friend-of-a-friend stories.</p>
<p>Your story is just one more for my &#8220;no eHarmony&#8221; bucket. I think they are $$$$$ and have some long questionnaire. Zzzzzz.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ack</title>
		<link>http://qmusings.com/2007/10/01/warning-objects-may-be-older-than-they-appear/comment-page-1/#comment-20804</link>
		<dc:creator>ack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 03:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://qmusings.com/blog/2007/10/01/warning-objects-may-be-older-than-they-appear/#comment-20804</guid>
		<description>I tried eHarmony once.  I&#039;d gotten an e-mail ad so I finall decided to do it.  I fill in the profile.  It does it&#039;s thing.  Instead of coming up with matches, it tells me to zark off.

:-O  Okay, it really didn&#039;t say zark off.  it was much nicer, but said in some mumbo jumbo that they couldn&#039;t match me.  not that they couldn&#039;t match me anyone in the system right now.  No, that they couldn&#039;t match my personality.  period.  Zark off.  Go directly some other site.  Do not pass go.  Do not collect a date.  Zark off.

Sweet.  If anyone watches me when I&#039;m watching TV, they might wonder why I flip off the eHarmony commercials, but you folks now know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried eHarmony once.  I&#8217;d gotten an e-mail ad so I finall decided to do it.  I fill in the profile.  It does it&#8217;s thing.  Instead of coming up with matches, it tells me to zark off.</p>
<p>:-O  Okay, it really didn&#8217;t say zark off.  it was much nicer, but said in some mumbo jumbo that they couldn&#8217;t match me.  not that they couldn&#8217;t match me anyone in the system right now.  No, that they couldn&#8217;t match my personality.  period.  Zark off.  Go directly some other site.  Do not pass go.  Do not collect a date.  Zark off.</p>
<p>Sweet.  If anyone watches me when I&#8217;m watching TV, they might wonder why I flip off the eHarmony commercials, but you folks now know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
